Paf Advises Finland To End Veikkaus Owned Online Gambling Monopoly

Finnish gambling operator Paf says that in order to resolve the issue of problem gambling more effectively, the country should end the online gambling monopoly held by state-owned Veikkaus.

On Friday, Paf CEO Christer Fahlstedt published an op-ed in local media in which he argued that “the problems in the Finnish gaming industry could be solved with a regulated licence system.” Fahlstedt warned the government that its attempt to try to block the access of Finnish gamblers to the online rivals of Veikkaus would not achieve its stated policy goals.

Over the past few years, Paf, which maintains a gambling monopoly in the autonomous Swedish-speaking Åland Islands region of Finland, has proactively taken measures to reduce its dependence on high-rolling gamblers, despite the negative effect on the financial performance of the company.

On the other hand, following a series of humiliating episodes that revealed its sketchy obligations to responsible gambling initiatives (not to mention transparency in procurement contracts), Veikkaus was more or less forced to introduce similar restrictions.

Veikkaus cautioned last December that its new responsible gambling policies would reduce its earnings by EUR 50 million, but recently downgraded its forecast 2020 shortfall to EUR 300 million due to pandemic-related constraints. It is this deficit that Paf’s Fahlstedt indicated could be remedied by a more dynamic online gaming industry, and its expected effect on funding for local charities.

Fahlstedt called the domain- and payment-blocking plans of the government “the wrong tool” for foreign gambling sites. In addition to being counterproductive, payment-blocking represented “an exceptional intrusion on the freedom of citizens and it would force banks to act as secret police guarding their customers’ transactions.”

Fahlstedt noted the number of European countries that have made successful transitions to competitive online markets, including Denmark and Sweden, from gambling monopolies. Fahlstedt claimed that these markets have limited ads for gambling, thus enabling problem gamblers to set expenditure limits or fully block access if limit-setting proves ineffective.

Fahlstedt supported Veikkaus retaining its monopoly on lottery and land-based slots, but insists that Veikkaus would be offered “an equal competitive role” by a more competitive online market , given that locally licenced sites would all be subject to the same restrictions.

Veikkaus, meanwhile, remains committed to its ‘what, I worry’ approach to its monopoly status, having recently released a press release supporting its ranking in the latest annual Customer Relationship Index survey in the top-10 (at #10) of Finnish firms.

During the pandemic, Veikkaus CEO Olli Sarekoski said that his company had conducted “great acts of responsibility” and said it was “great that our customers have noted this.” Sadly, the recent shortcomings of Veikkaus have led to consumers adopting a more negative perception of gambling as a whole, so maybe the ticker-tape parade is not yet scheduled.